I. Introduction
Double taxation occurs when the same income is taxed by two different countries, creating an excessive burden that discourages cross-border trade and investment. In today’s globalized economy where capital, goods, services, and technology move freely across borders, the risk of double taxation has increased significantly. Nepal addresses this challenge through Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) and provisions in the Income Tax Act, 2058 (2002), providing mechanisms for foreign companies to legitimately avoid paying tax twice on the same income.
II. Understanding Double Taxation
1) Types of Double Taxation
a) Juridical Double Taxation occurs when the same taxpayer is required to pay taxes to two different governments on the same income. This commonly arises when a taxpayer resides in one country but earns income in another, making them liable for taxation in both jurisdictions.
Example: An Indian company providing consulting services to a Nepalese client faces Nepal’s withholding tax on the payment and India’s corporate tax on the same income. Without relief mechanisms, the combined tax burden could exceed 40-50%, making the transaction economically unviable.
b) Economic Double Taxation refers to taxation of the same income by the same government but affecting two different taxpayers. A common example is corporate profits taxed at the company level and then taxed again as dividends in shareholders’ hands.
2) Taxation Principles
Two competing principles create the double taxation problem:
- Source-Based Jurisdiction: The country where income originates has the right to tax it. If someone works in Nepal, Nepal claims taxing rights because it provides the opportunity and resources to generate that income.
- Residence-Based Jurisdiction: The country where a person or entity resides has the right to tax their worldwide income regardless of where it’s earned. If a corporation is incorporated in India, India claims the right to tax all its income, including from Nepal operations.
When both principles apply simultaneously, double taxation results.
III. Nepal’s Legal Framework
Section 73 of the Income Tax Act, 2058 (2002)
Section 73(1): Power to Conclude International Agreements
The Government of Nepal may conclude international agreements with foreign countries for the avoidance of double taxation when any income of any person is taxable under Nepal’s Income Tax Act and the same income is also taxable in a foreign country.The law defines “international agreement” as any treaty or agreement with a foreign government applicable to Nepal that contains provisions to avoid double taxation and prevent fiscal evasion, or to render reciprocal administrative assistance in implementing tax liability.
Section 73(2) and (3): Collection Assistance
When a competent authority of another treaty country requests Nepal’s Inland Revenue Department to collect amounts payable by persons in arrears under that country’s taxation law, the Department may send written notice requiring payment within a specified date. This collected amount is then sent to the requesting competent authority, facilitating international tax cooperation.
Section 73(4) and (5): Anti-Abuse Provisions
When international agreements contain provisions requiring Nepal to exempt income or payments or apply reduced tax rates, certain entities are denied these benefits to prevent treaty abuse.
Specifically, benefits are denied to entities that are considered residents of the other party country for agreement purposes and where fifty percent or more of the vested ownership is held by individuals or entities (in which individuals have no interest) who are residents of both Nepal and the other treaty country. This provision prevents abuse through dual-resident entities that could manipulate benefits under multiple tax regimes.
IV. Nepal’s DTAA Network
Nepal has concluded DTAAs with eleven countries following principles established by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and United Nations (UN). Nepal’s treaty partners include India (first agreement 1987, revised 2011), Norway (1996), Thailand, Sri Lanka, Mauritius, Austria, Pakistan, China, South Korea, Qatar, and Bangladesh (2019). Negotiations continue with additional countries including Singapore, Malaysia, United Kingdom, and Oman.
The India-Nepal DTAA is particularly significant given extensive economic ties between the countries. This agreement, revised in 2011 and effective from March 2012, addresses taxation of business profits, dividends, interest, royalties, technical fees, capital gains, and employment income.
V. Key Concepts in Tax Treaties
1) Permanent Establishment (PE)
Section 68 of the Income Tax Act addresses permanent establishments. A PE represents a fixed place of business through which a foreign enterprise conducts operations in Nepal. Business profits are generally taxable in Nepal only if the foreign company maintains a PE there.
Common PEs include:
- Branch offices
- Factories or manufacturing facilities
- Construction sites exceeding specified durations (typically 6-12 months)
- Dependent agents with authority to conclude contracts
Non-PE situations:
- Independent agents acting in ordinary business
- Storage or display facilities without sales
- Purchasing offices
- Short-term service provision below treaty thresholds
Practical implication: If an Indian consulting company sends employees to Nepal for a 3-month project, it typically doesn’t create a PE, meaning business profits escape Nepal taxation. However, extending the project beyond 6 months may create a PE, subjecting profits to Nepal tax.
2) Beneficial Ownership
DTAAs apply only to beneficial owners, entities truly entitled to income and controlling its use. This prevents treaty shopping where companies route income through intermediary entities in treaty countries solely for tax benefits without genuine business substance.
Nepal’s tax authorities increasingly scrutinize beneficial ownership, requiring demonstration of real operational presence, decision-making authority, and commercial rationale beyond tax optimization.
3) Tax Residency
Treaties provide guidelines for determining residency of individuals and entities. A Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) issued by the home country tax authority serves as official proof of residence status for treaty purposes. Schedule 11 of the Income Tax Act prescribes the format for TRCs in Nepal.
VI. Methods to Eliminate Double Taxation
1) Exemption Method
The residence country simply exempts foreign-source income from taxation, leaving only the source country to tax. This method provides complete relief but is less common in Nepal’s treaties.
2) Tax Credit Method
The foreign tax credit method is more prevalent. The residence country taxes worldwide income but allows credit for taxes paid in the source country, limited to the lower of actual foreign tax paid or the home country tax attributable to foreign income.
Example:
- Income from Nepal: NPR 1,000,000
- Nepal withholding tax (10%): NPR 100,000
- Home country tax rate (30%): NPR 300,000
- Credit for Nepal tax: NPR 100,000
- Additional home country tax: NPR 200,000
- Total tax: NPR 300,000 (not NPR 400,000 without relief)
VII. Practical Steps for Foreign Companies
Step 1: Verify Treaty Applicability
Confirm whether Nepal has a DTAA with your home country. Identify which treaty articles apply to your specific income type (business profits, dividends, interest, royalties, technical fees). Verify your company qualifies as a treaty resident.
Step 2: Obtain Tax Residency Certificate
Apply to your home country’s tax authority for a TRC certifying your tax residence status. The certificate must be current for the relevant fiscal year and contain company details, tax identification number, and official residence confirmation. Some countries may require apostille or consular authentication.
Step 3: Submit Documentation to Nepal
Before payment occurs, provide the Nepalese payer with required documentation to apply reduced withholding rates:
- Valid Tax Residency Certificate
- Company incorporation certificate
- Treaty benefit claim form
- Beneficial ownership declaration
- Board resolution authorizing treaty claims
The payer then withholds at the treaty rate rather than domestic rate, providing immediate benefit.
Step 4: Maintain Compliance
File tax returns in Nepal if required (PE cases, certain thresholds). Report Nepal-source income in your home country return. Claim foreign tax credit by attaching Nepal withholding certificates and payment evidence. Maintain documentation for potential audits in either jurisdiction.
VIII. Anti-Abuse Provisions
1) Treaty Shopping Prevention
Treaty shopping involves routing income through entities in treaty countries to obtain benefits not directly available. Nepal’s anti-treaty shopping provisions in Section 73(4) and 73(5) deny benefits to conduit companies lacking genuine substance.
Example: A Bhutanese construction company registers in India solely to access the India-Nepal DTAA for Nepal projects. Nepal may deny treaty benefits if the company lacks genuine Indian substance.
2) Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)
Nepal participates in international initiatives addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, tax planning strategies exploiting gaps in tax rules to artificially shift profits to low-tax locations. The OECD/G20 BEPS Package provides 15 Actions giving governments tools to ensure profits are taxed where economic activities occur and value is created.
IX. Conclusion
Nepal’s framework for avoiding double taxation, established through Section 73 of the Income Tax Act and bilateral DTAAs with eleven countries, provides legitimate mechanisms for foreign companies to avoid excessive tax burdens. Success requires understanding treaty provisions, obtaining proper documentation including Tax Residency Certificates, demonstrating beneficial ownership and substance, and maintaining compliance in both jurisdictions.
Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, advertisement, personal communication, solicitation or inducement. No attorney-client relationship is created through this content. Gandhi & Associates assumes no liability for any consequences resulting from actions taken based on information contained herein.
For quick legal assistance:
Phone/Viber/WhatsApp: +977 9709035477
For specific legal advice regarding applicability of double tax avoidance in Nepal, please contact our office to schedule a consultation with our experts.